Illinois Teratogen Information Service

1-800-252-4847

Vitamin A and Pregnancy

Vitamin A and Pregnancy

Posted by admin on March 2nd, 1996 — in newsletter

PDF Version

Vitamin A and Pregnancy

Vol 4#6, March 1996

Eugene Pergament, MD, PhD; Amy Schechtman, MS, CGC; Carrie Curell, BA

With the recent advent in popularity of multivitamins and megavitamins, it is becoming increasingly important to be aware of the possible teratogenic effects of high doses of vitamins during pregnancy. Vitamins are essential for maintaining good health, but consumption of large amounts of certain vitamins, particularly A and D, poses a teratogenic risk. Vitamin A is essential for the normal functioning of the retina and for growth and differentiation of epithelial tissue as well as necessary in embryonic development, reproduction and bone growth. However, vitamin A has been shown to produce teratogenic effects in animal studies when administered in high doses. The possible teratogenic risk associated with vitamin A has recently come under some debate concerning the amount that will begin to produce an increased frequency of congenital malformations in human offspring exposed during gestation. This RISK||NEWSLETTER will focus on the effect of large doses of vitamin A on pregnancy.

RETINOID VERSUS BETA-CAROTENE

Vitamin A is a term encompassing two forms: a retinoid, a preformed vitamin A originating from animal tissue; and, beta-carotene, a provitamin A compound originating from plant tissue. Beta-carotene is a carotenoid occurring naturally in foods such as carrots, meats and dark green leafy vegetables. Beta-carotene is converted in the body to the retinol form of vitamin A. This conversion does decrease substantially when large amounts of beta-carotene are ingested (USP DI, 1994). Therefore, large amounts of beta-carotene should not lead to toxicity or teratogenicity because the conversion to the retinol form is actually decreased with increasing amounts of beta-carotene. The Teratology Society has concluded that beta-carotene is not a human teratogen (Teratology, 1987).

ISOTRETINOIN (ACCUTANE)

Results of studies on a related compound, isotretinoin initially raised concerns about vitamin A dosages in pregnancy. Isotretinoin is a 13-cis-retinoic acid used to treat severe cystic acne. This chemical has vitamin A activity. It was shown to cause major malformations in 20% of fetuses exposed during early pregnancy (Lammer et al., 1985). These malformations involved four structures: the cranium and face; the heart; the thymus; and, the brain. Isotretinoin is thought to interfere with cranial crest cells, which contribute to the development of the ear and conotruncal areas of the heart. In this study mothers took daily doses of 0.5-1.5 mg/kg/day. The relative risk for brain, cardiac, or ear malformations in exposed fetuses was 25.6 times higher than the risk for unexposed fetuses (Lammer et al., 1985).

VITAMIN A AND CONGENITAL ANOMALIES

Numerous animal studies involving vitamin A administration during pregnancy have reported teratogenic effects. Pregnant rats fed 35,000 IU/day 2-16 of gestation had an increased frequency of encephaly, cleft lip and/or palate, brachygnathia and various eye defects (Cohlan, 1953). Subsequent reports on mice, guinea pigs, hamsters, and rabbits found these species to be similarly susceptible to hypervitaminosis A. The teratogenicity of vitamin A in animals lead to the assumption that vitamin A, not beta-carotene, is a human teratogen, even though much of the direct evidence for its teratogenicity comes from anecdotal reports of mothers consuming >25,000 IU/day during pregnancy.

One report stated urinary tract malformations were seen in an infant of a women taking 25,000 IU during the first three months of pregnancy and 50,000 IU during the fourth through ninth months of gestation (Bernhardt et al., 1974). An earlier report also described an infant born with gross urinary tract defects in which the mother had ingested 40,000 IU of vitamin A per day from the sixth through the tenth weeks of pregnancy (Pilotti et al., 1965). Central nervous system defects were present after ingestion of 150,000 IU per day during pregnancy (Stange et al., 1978). Between 1984-1986 there were ten case reports describing possible teratogenic effects of vitamin A on a pregnancy. These case reports were mainly reported by doctors to the FDA or by a state birth defect registry. Doses in these pregnancies ranged from 25,000 to 100,000 units/day before and throughout pregnancy. Those women taking 25,000 to 33,000 units/day had offspring with microcephaly, ear malformations, and transposition of great vessels. These three defects were not seen in combination in any of the infants (Rosa, 1986). Women taking doses of 40,000 units or more per day before and during pregnancy had infants with combinations of malformations. One infant had tiny ear canals, facial dysmorphy and high palate. Cleft lip and/or palate were consistently seen in all infants exposed to 40,000 IU/day or more (Rosa, 1986).

IS THERE A DOSE-RESPONSE THRESHOLD?

Case reports and anecdotal studies suggest vitamin A intake of 25,000 IU or more during pregnancy increases the risk for congenital anomalies (Rosa et al., 1986). Rothman et al. (1995) undertook a study in order to clarify the issue of what dose of vitamin A begins to pose an increased risk for congenital anomalies. Between October 1984 and June 1987 22,748 pregnant women were identified of which 339 babies had birth defects; 121 of these infants had defects in sites arising from the cranial neural crest. The trend for the risk for musculoskeletal and urogenital tract defects was less apparent, and no discernible risk was observed for neural tube defects. Women who consumed more than 15,000 IU of preformed vitamin A from food and supplements had infants with defects associated with cranial-neural-crest tissue 3.5 times greater than women who consumed 5000 IU or less (95% CI, 1.7-7.3). The prevalence ratio of these defects for women who consumed more than 10,000 IU/day compared to women who consumed less than 5000 IU/day from supplement alone was 4.8 (95% CI, 2.2-10.5). Rothman et al. (1995) reported finding a threshold for supplemental vitamin A near 10,000 IU/day. The increased frequency of malformations was observed more frequently among infants born to women ingesting large amounts of vitamin A before the seventh week of gestation. The authors of this study concluded that approximately 1 in 57 infants would have malformations attributable to vitamin A supplements at doses above 10,000 IU/day.

The study by Rothman et al. (1995) is not without controversy over the results. Oakley and Erickson (1995) expressed concern about the need for more detailed data on the amount of vitamin A consumed by women who took 10,000 IU or more during pregnancy. The mean vitamin A intake in this group was 21,675 IU/day, which suggests some fetuses were exposed to more than 25,000 IU/day. Specific exposure information is necessary before it is recommended that the dose-response threshold curve described in the paper by Rothman et al. (1995) be utilized. In responding to this criticism the authors state, “the curve shows about a 5-fold increase in birth defects for women taking daily doses of retinol, and is fitted through individual data points.”

Several studies have assessed the risk to a pregnancy with maternal intake of 8000 IU or less of preformed vitamin A during pregnancy. Khoury et al. (1996) examined data from a large population-based case control study of major birth defects conducted by the Center for Disease Control. Mothers of infants with serious birth defects were compared to mothers of infants without birth defects. No increased risk was observed among vitamin A and multivitamin users or among women who took both multivitamins and vitamin A supplements together (OR .54, 95% CI .22-1.33). These authors also reviewed numerous case studies in order to assess whether specific phenotypes were associated with vitamin A use. They compared case studies of babies with birth defects whose mothers used vitamin A supplements with babies with birth defects whose mothers reported not using any vitamin A supplements during pregnancy. No differences were observed between the two groups when looking at patterns and types of birth defects, presence of multiple congenital anomalies and recognizable phenotypes. They did not have information on the amount of vitamin A ingested, but most multivitamins and supplements during that time period contained 8000 IU of retinol. The authors state that “these data should provide reassurance that vitamin A supplements under 8000 IU do not increase the risk for birth defects (Khoury, 1996)”.

Several studies have been reported revealing no increase in congenital anomalies after prenatal exposure to large amounts of vitamin A. These include 1203 infants exposed to 6000 IU daily during the first trimester of gestation (Dudas and Czeizel, 1992); and, a case control study of 11,293 children with minor and major malformations and maternal use of 10,000 IU or more of vitamin A per day (Martinez-Frias and Salvador, 1988, 1990).

SUMMARY

The recommended daily allowance for preformed vitamin A is 2700 IU/day or 8000 IU of beta-carotene. In 1987 the CDC, Teratology Society and Council for Responsible Nutrition independently published recommendations for use of vitamin A during pregnancy. These were made because teratogenicity appears to occur at some undetermined level above 8000 IU and pregnant women in the United States do not seem to benefit from additional vitamin A. They recommend limiting vitamin A in prenatal vitamins to 5000-8000 IU and vitamin A content of all multivitamins to 10,000 IU; therein suggesting women should not ingest more than 10,000 IU prior to consulting a physician.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors and Pregnancy

Posted by admin on March 1st, 1996 — in newsletter

PDF Version

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors and Pregnancy

Vol 4#5, March 1996

Eugene Pergament, MD, Ph.D.; Amy Schechman, MS, CGC; Lindsay Jordan, BS

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are used to treat hypertension and congestive heart failure. ACE is a dipeptidyl-caroxypeptidase which catalyzes the conversion of the biologically inactive decapeptide angiotensin I to the active octapeptide angiotensin II. Angiotensin II is one of the most potent vasoconstrictors known.

The use of ACE inhibitors first started in 1977 with the introduction of captopril. Today there are over 15 agents that fall into the category of ACE inhibitors. These hypertensive agents have an advantage over other agents because they work by enhancing blood flow to vital organs without altering cardiac output or causing adverse metabolic consequences (Barr and Cohen 1991; Hanssens et al., 1991). Because of this characteristic, ACE inhibitors are becoming more frequently use din women of reproductive age. By 1989, over a million prescriptions for these drugs were dispensed annually with approximately 5% prescribed for women in their child bearing years (Piper, 1992). Over time case reports of women exposed to ACE inhibitors have accumulated and on March 13, 1992 the U.S. Federal Drug Administration issued a warning regarding the use of ACE inhibitors in pregnancy. Because of the associations between fetal complications and malformations and ACE inhibitors, the FDA recommended that women avoid taking ACE inhibitors during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. This RISK||NEWSLETTER will address the use of these drugs and their effects on pregnancy.

RISK DURING THE FIRST TRIMESTER

In the past ACE inhibitors were not considered to be significantly associated with risk of malformations when used during the first trimester. Recently there have been reports suggesting that their use during the first trimester, while not associated with malformation may not entirely safe.

Among 14 infants born to women who were treated with captopril during their first trimester, no malformations were found (Kreft-Jais et al., 1988). In another study Piper (1992) looked at 106,813 women. Nineteen women were found to have used ACE inhibitors during pregnancy. Seven of those women used the drug captopril during the first trimester and no association with congenital anomalies was found.

More recently, Hanssens et al. (1991) reviewed the literature and reported 4 spontaneous pregnancy losses (before 14 weeks) and 2 terminations in 47 pregnancies. These women were treated during the first trimester with ACE inhibitors along with other drugs. Of the 6 losses, two cases had no information on fetal normality, three were normal, and one case had fetal leg and skull abnormalities. Rabbour (1994) reported on a mother who was exposed to enalapril throughout the beginning of her pregnancy. A cesarean was performed at 28 weeks because of acute distress syndrome. The infant then developed hypotension, anuria, and generalized edema. At 2 years unilateral kidney hypoplasia was diagnosed.

RISKS DURING THE SECOND AND THIRD TRIMESTERS

Studies have shown that there is a risk associated with the use of ACE inhibitors during the second and third trimesters. Guignard et al. (1988) have shown that captopril and enalapril can cross the placenta in the developing fetus. These drugs are believed to have a pharmacological effect during the fetal period of development, stage of pregnancy from eight weeks after conception until term.

The risks of ACE inhibitors are mainly based on case reports and small studies gathered since use of the drugs began. Rosa et al. (1989) reported on four cases of neonatal anuria in infants born to women exposed to either captopril or enalapril during pregnancy.

In a case reported by Barr (1990), a 26 year-old woman gave birth to an infant with oligohydramnios, pulmonary hypoplasia, and skull defects after being treated throughout pregnancy with captopril and other drugs. This study did not take into account the use of other drugs, which may have confounded the results.

Piper et al. (1992) reported two serious outcomes when ACE inhibitors were used during the second and third trimesters or throughout pregnancy. One infant had prolonged anuria and another had occipital encephalocele. The authors stated that even though there were only two adverse outcomes, the small size of the cohort might indicate that the absolute risk could be high. The authors suggested as sources of bias the possibility of other teratogenic exposures and maternal characteristics linked to the use of ACE inhibitors.

Rhabbour et al. (1994) reported a case of a 24 year-old woman who gave birth to twins after exposure during the third trimester. The first infant, a boy, had hypotension and oliguria, and later developed chronic renal failure and hypertension. The second infant, a girl, suffered respiratory distress syndrome followed by hypotension and oliguria.

Lisinopril, another ACE inhibitor, has also been associated with renal failure, fetal skull hypoplasia, and oligohydramnios (Rosa and Bosco, 1991).

Hanssens et al. (1991) reported a high frequency of fetal growth retardation with exposure to ACE inhibitors, but commented that this finding may be associated with the underlying hypertension and not the ACE inhibitor treatments.

OTHER FACTORS

Women who are treated with ACE inhibitors use these drugs because they usually have severe or resistant hypertension. Hypertension is associated with fetal and maternal complications during pregnancy. These complications include perinatal death, small for gestational age, and poor perinatal outcome (Sibai, 1992; Williams, 1995). Some of the fetal complications, e.g., intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) and acute and chronic fetal distress, are similar to those seen in pregnant women treated with captopril (Hacker and Moore, 1986; Sibai, 1991). It is difficult therefore to determine if the problems result from the medications or the underlying condition of hypertension. Other studies are needed to determine how much of a risk is associated with the use of ACE inhibitors and how much risk may be due to the complications associated with hypertension.

POSSIBLE MECHANISM

A definite mechanism for the pattern of developmental disturbances caused by ACE inhibitors is unknown. In lowering the fetal blood pressure, ACE inhibitors may cause IUGR as well as renal problems. Low fetal blood pressure and low uterine pressure on the head due to oligohydramnios reportedly causes reduced blood circulation to the periphery of the skull. This may account for deformities and underdevelopment in skull formation (Brent and Beckman, 1991; Barr and Cohen, 1991).

RISKS WHEN BREAST FEEDING

Captopril is excreted in milk in very limited amounts (Devlin, 1981). The WHO Working Group on Drugs and Human Lactation showed that a maximum of 0.014% of the maternal dose of captopril would be ingested during breast-feeding. They, therefore, concluded that it was safe to use captopril during breast-feeding.

SUMMARY

Overall, ACE inhibitors are not associated with malformations or adverse outcomes when used during the first trimester, although isolated cases of anuria, skull deformities, hypotension and edema have been observed at this time. ACE inhibitors have been associated with oligohydramnios, fetal death, neonatal anuria and death, fetal skull hypoplasia, IUGR and pulmonary hypoplasia when used during the fetal stage of development. Controlled studies need to be conducted to determine the magnitude of the risk associated with these drugs when used during the second or third trimesters.

Because of the possible risks associated with ACE inhibitors, alternate medications should be used during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. In some cases ACE inhibitors may be the only way to control hypertension during pregnancy. When hypertension cannot be controlled by any other means, the risks of the drug’s usage and the teratogenic risks to the pregnancy need to be weighed and carefully considered.